formulation of literary production field in iran (the cases of mohammad hejazi and sadegh hedayat)

نویسندگان

یوسف اباذری

عضو هیئت علمی گروه جامعه شناسی دانشگاه تهران رضا تسلیمی طهرانی

دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی نظری فرهنگی دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

this paper aims to study and formulate the field of literature in iran during 1921 and 1941. for this purpose, the authors have focused on two key writers of this period, mohammad hejazi and sadegh hedayat. analyzing the social positions, habitus and literary works of these writers can help us to have a clear picture of the mentioned period. it also can show dominant poles in the literary field in iran. we have used pierre bourdieu’s “practice theory” as our theoretical framework and his “genetic structuralism” as our methodology. mohammad hejazi was born in a middle-class bourgeois family. he served as a senator for several periods and deputy of prime minister for some years. thus he had politically a high position in the period under study. also, as a novelist, he wrote about rich families, especially bourgeois girls. despite this, he did not have any valuable capital that would bring him a remarkable position in the literary field. his position was located in the dominated pole and in the bourgeois literature position. in addition, when studying his habitus, one would face an optimistic and conservative person. in short, there is a homology between his positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus. in one of hejazi’s novels titled homa, one can find a homology between the writer’s positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus with hero’s positions in the power and action fields of story and his habitus. like hejazi, sadegh hedayat was also born in a middle-class bourgeois family. but his position in his family as the younger son let him to pursue his own way. actually he never held any important politiposition. he never got married and finally committed suicide. thus he had no political position. but hedayet is a famous writer because he wrote some valuable novels. he had important cultural capitals. he never wrote for others; rather he used to write for himself. thus hedayat had a main position in the dominant pole of literary field. furthermore, when considering his habitus, one would face a pessimistic, disobedient, independent character. in short, there is a homology between hedayat’s positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus. in hedayat’s famous novel, boofe koor, one can find a homology between writer’s positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus with hero’s positions in the power and action fields of story and his habitus. according to our study, hejazi and hedayat have had opposite positions in the fields of power and literature and have opposite habitus. in other words, these two famous writers had opposite social trajectories. in addition, we can trace these oppositions in writers’ novels. heroes have opposite positions in each story and have opposite habitus. at last, we have to consider that all characteristics of hedayat and hejazi have to be understood in relation to their social positions and habitus rather than their own special life histories.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

the survey of the virtual higher education in iran and the ways of its development and improvement

این پژوهش با هدف "بررسی وضعیت موجود آموزش عالی مجازی در ایران و راههای توسعه و ارتقای آن " و با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و پیمایشی صورت پذیرفته است. بررسی اسنادو مدارک موجود در زمینه آموزش مجازی نشان داد تعداد دانشجویان و مقاطع تحصیلی و رشته محل های دوره های الکترونیکی چندان مطلوب نبوده و از نظر کیفی نیز وضعیت شاخص خدمات آموزشی اساتید و وضعیت شبکه اینترنت در محیط آموزش مجازی نامطلوب است.

the impact of e-readiness on ec success in public sector in iran the impact of e-readiness on ec success in public sector in iran

acknowledge the importance of e-commerce to their countries and to survival of their businesses and in creating and encouraging an atmosphere for the wide adoption and success of e-commerce in the long term. the investment for implementing e-commerce in the public sector is one of the areas which is focused in government‘s action plan for cross-disciplinary it development and e-readiness in go...

a fundamental study of "histiriographic metafiction", and "literary genres", as introduced in "new historical philosophy", and tracing them in the works of julian barnes.

abstract a fundamental study of “historio-graphic metafiction” and “literary genres”, as introduced in “new historical philosophy”, and tracing them in the works of julian barnes having studied the two novels, the porcupine and arthur & george, by julian barnes, the researcher has applied linda hutcheon’s historio-graphic metafictional theories to them. the thesis is divided into five cha...

15 صفحه اول

phylogeography and genetic diversity of the lesser mouse- eared bat (myotis blythii) in iran

in current study, 63 samples of bat populations collected from differ regions were used for evaluating the geographic variations. twenty cranial and dental characters for traditional morphometric and landmarks method on the ventral, dorsal skull and mandible for geometry morphometric studies were used. statistical analyses of traditional morphometric and geometry morphometric data indicated low...

the translators agency and ideological manipulation in translation: the case of political texts in translation classes in iran

در این تحقیق به نقش واسطه ای مترجم در ایجاد تغییرات ایدئولوژیک در ترجمه متون سیاسی پرداخته شده است. بدین منظور محقق متنی سیاسی در خصوص ادعاهای آمریکا در مورد برنامه هسته ای ایران را انتخاب کرد. این متن از سایت spacewar.com انتخاب شد که دارای ایدئولوژی مغرضانه در مورد برنامه هسته ای ایران است. سپس یک گروه 30 نفره از دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشدرشته مترجمی زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه شیخ بهایی انتخاب شدند. ا...

15 صفحه اول

the analysis of the role of the speech acts theory in translating and dubbing hollywood films

از محوری ترین اثراتی که یک فیلم سینمایی ایجاد می کند دیالوگ هایی است که هنرپیش گان فیلم میگویند. به زعم یک فیلم ساز, یک شیوه متأثر نمودن مخاطب از اثر منظوره نیروی گفتارهای گوینده, مثل نیروی عاطفی, ترس آور, غم انگیز, هیجان انگیز و غیره, است. این مطالعه به بررسی این مسأله مبادرت کرده است که آیا نیروی فراگفتاری هنرپیش گان به مثابه ی اعمال گفتاری در پنج فیلم هالیوودی در نسخه های دوبله شده باز تولید...

15 صفحه اول

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
جامعه شناسی هنر و ادبیات

جلد ۴، شماره ۱، صفحات ۵-۲۹

کلمات کلیدی
this paper aims to study and formulate the field of literature in iran during 1921 and 1941. for this purpose the authors have focused on two key writers of this period mohammad hejazi and sadegh hedayat. analyzing the social positions habitus and literary works of these writers can help us to have a clear picture of the mentioned period. it also can show dominant poles in the literary field in iran. we have used pierre bourdieu’s “practice theory” as our theoretical framework and his “genetic structuralism” as our methodology. mohammad hejazi was born in a middle class bourgeois family. he served as a senator for several periods and deputy of prime minister for some years. thus he had politically a high position in the period under study. also as a novelist he wrote about rich families especially bourgeois girls. despite this he did not have any valuable capital that would bring him a remarkable position in the literary field. his position was located in the dominated pole and in the bourgeois literature position. in addition when studying his habitus one would face an optimistic and conservative person. in short there is a homology between his positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus. in one of hejazi’s novels titled homa one can find a homology between the writer’s positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus with hero’s positions in the power and action fields of story and his habitus. like hejazi sadegh hedayat was also born in a middle class bourgeois family. but his position in his family as the younger son let him to pursue his own way. actually he never held any important politiposition. he never got married and finally committed suicide. thus he had no political position. but hedayet is a famous writer because he wrote some valuable novels. he had important cultural capitals. he never wrote for others; rather he used to write for himself. thus hedayat had a main position in the dominant pole of literary field. furthermore when considering his habitus one would face a pessimistic disobedient independent character. in short there is a homology between hedayat’s positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus. in hedayat’s famous novel boofe koor one can find a homology between writer’s positions in the fields of power and literature and his habitus with hero’s positions in the power and action fields of story and his habitus. according to our study hejazi and hedayat have had opposite positions in the fields of power and literature and have opposite habitus. in other words these two famous writers had opposite social trajectories. in addition we can trace these oppositions in writers’ novels. heroes have opposite positions in each story and have opposite habitus. at last we have to consider that all characteristics of hedayat and hejazi have to be understood in relation to their social positions and habitus rather than their own special life histories.

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023